|
|
Post by Vish on Aug 31, 2003 15:50:25 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by Vish on May 7, 2004 0:52:17 GMT 10
Danny Jacobs + Lance Picione = Drunks
Nathan Thompson + Goals = Junk Time.
Crawford < 100% = No Hawthawn.
extreemly bored
|
|
|
|
Post by HH on May 10, 2004 17:54:54 GMT 10
Hawthorn + Thompson + Holland = Shit
Hawthorn - Thompson - Holland = Shitter
Does that look right?
Maths was never my strong suit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vish on May 10, 2004 18:57:41 GMT 10
Neither was mine [Further Maths] but bagging the Hawks is!
Hawthawn + Easiest draw in the AFL = Still shit.
Collingwood + Less than 6 wins = Priority picks = A genuine chance for a flag next year = Vish/Harley happy.
|
|
|
|
Post by HH on May 11, 2004 23:15:43 GMT 10
So you've officially drawn stumps on season 2004?
Yup, me too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vish on May 12, 2004 18:11:40 GMT 10
(Hawthawn +  ) < (Collingwood + ) Does that make sense? |
|
|
|
Post by HH on May 12, 2004 20:37:36 GMT 10
Not really.
What goes after the +?
|
|
|
|
Post by Vish on May 12, 2004 20:54:30 GMT 10
Not really. What goes after the +? = Crybabies. So, HFC are greater crybabies then the CFC |
|
|
|
Post by HH on May 12, 2004 21:18:58 GMT 10
Ah, okay. The smiley hadn't appeared yet.
And you're inequality should be facing the other way.
Mmm, pedantry ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Arunava Das on May 13, 2004 20:34:15 GMT 10
And YOUR inequality should be facing the other way. Mmm, pedantry ;D. Sorry Harley, you left it wide open for me to strike. |
|
|
|
Post by HH on May 13, 2004 23:35:11 GMT 10
Masterly riposte Mr Das.
Call myself a pedant...
|
|
|
|
Post by Vish on May 16, 2004 20:41:15 GMT 10
Freo = Hawthawn's bitches.
|
|
|
|
Post by HH on May 17, 2004 23:53:53 GMT 10
10 wins, 1 loss
Port = Kangaroos' bitches
|
|
|
|
Post by Vish on May 31, 2004 18:53:42 GMT 10
|
|
|
|
Post by HH on Jun 21, 2004 17:40:15 GMT 10
Great bit of essendon-bashing in the age this morning.
Thank you Rohan Connolly.
|
|
) < (Collingwood + 
